The Rising Career Of Litigation Attorney Karl Heideck

The Rising Career Of Litigation Attorney Karl HeideckKarl Heideck is an accomplished litigation attorney in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. He obtained his juris doctor degree from Temple University School of Law.

Prior to entering law school, Heideck studied at Swarthmore, where he obtained a bachelor’s degree in English language and literature. Heideck graduated with honors, both at Swarthmore College as well as at Temple University.

Heideck has been practicing law for about a decade. When it comes to his work as a litigation lawyer, he represents individuals, businesses, and organizations. He is well-versed on all aspects of the litigation process.

Karl Heideck also practices employment lawIn addition to representing clients as a tenacious litigator, Heideck also practices employment law. He also maintains a commercial law practice as well. In addition, Heideck represents clients in regard to regulatory compliance, risk management, and products liability law.

The typical litigator begins setting his or her sights on this area of the law while still in law school. There are a set of core classes that a person interested in becoming a litigation attorney tend to pursue in law school. These include civil procedure, courtroom practice, and evidence.

Oftentimes, a lawyer interested in becoming a litigator actually begins his or her career on the criminal side of the judicial system. A person who wants to develop into a skilled, capable litigator will take a job in a prosecuting attorney’s office. A lawyer takes this route because of the significant amount of courtroom work that is involved in working with a prosecuting attorney.

Many litigation attorneys are part of larger law firms. In these types of settings, a firm may have a special department made up of litigators. Other times a litigator will be on the staff of a business or governmental agency. There are businesses and governmental agencies that face a notable amount of time involved in litigation.

March 9, 2017

Posted In: Attorneys

“NZ a Model of Tax Transparency” Article Summary

In his New Zealand Herald article entitled “NZ a Model of Tax Transparency,” attorney Geoffrey Cone outlines his argument for the ethical nature of New Zealand’s foreign trusts. Cone not only debunks the tax haven myth by illustrating how his country complies with standards created by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, but he also points out that New Zealand holds a spot on the OECD’s coveted “white list,” proving that it has largely conformed to the group’s internationally agreed standards. Besides New Zealand’s adherence to pacts signed by multilateral bodies, the country’s own international agreements are also used by Cone to bolster his case. He outlines the nation’s 39 double tax agreements, 20 tax information exchange agreements, and New Zealand’s participation in the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters. As Cone points out, these are “not the actions of a tax haven.” The author sums up his argument by praising the honesty and virtue of his colleagues in the industry, citing that many of the service providers are lawyers and accountants who are not only subject to their own government’s strict regulations but are also members of the International Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP). Mr. Cone believes that he and his counterparts are part of the reason New Zealand has such a sterling reputation with the international community when it comes to foreign trusts and taxes. Instead of accusing them of creating a tax haven, the author suggests instead that the focus be on regulating trust companies to guarantee they meet the same high standards, thus further bolstering New Zealand’s excellent reputation in this area.

Geoffrey Cone is a founding partner of Cone Marshall Limited in Auckland where he specializes in international trust and tax planning. After graduating from University of Otago, New Zealand, he received an advanced degree in tax and trust law before beginning practice in 1980 and later joining a prestigious law firm in Christchurch. Cone Marshall was found in 1997 and holds the distinction of being the only New Zealand firm to focus on international trust and tax planning. Mr. Cone shares a vacation home near Jose Ignacio, Uruguay with his wife, Sarah. His favorite hobbies include entertaining family and friends, sailing his boat in the lagoon, and riding around in “Willy,” his trusty old army jeep.

October 4, 2016

Posted In: Attorneys

A Review Of The Progress The SEC Whistleblower Has Made Through Labaton Sucharow

Labaton Sucharow, an established law firm that has been working with SEC Whistleblower lawyers, is among few that have managed to assist clients until they receive compensation for exposing violations of securities laws. Their recent achievement includes a case where one of their clients earned over $17 million having exposed securities violations in the financial services industry.

This is viewed as a major step since the amount represents the second largest award issued by the SEC Whistleblower program since it was introduced in 2010. As part of their policies, the SEC could not reveal details about the specific actions the whistleblower reported about so as to keep his identity anonymous.

Jordan A. Thomas, a senior SEC Whistleblower attorney and the chair of the Whistleblower Representation Practice at Labaton Sucharow stated that the client blew the whistle and exposed the wrong doings that were prevalent in the financial services industry despite the fact many people kept quiet about the violations so they could protect the investors.

He explains that this is just a beginning and they are encouraging more people with information to join their team for assistance that could lead to determination that will see them walk away with awards from the SEC.

About the SEC Whistleblower Program
Started in 2010, the SEC Whistleblower program is working to eliminate securities violations in the business world. Before the introduction of the program, the reporting procedures available could not guarantee whistleblowers personal security and there were not enough channels to facilitate reporting about international cases. This led to the amendment of the Consumer Protection Act to include policies that were friendly to whistleblowers and effective to make it easy to process cases of securities violations.

Anonymous reporting
To ensure the identity of whistleblowers is protected, the SEC Whistleblower program has the anonymous reporting option where a whistleblower may choose to present the information with their identity shielded from public domain. This provision has motivated many people to present their findings since there is no risk their identity could be revealed in the process.

International whistleblowers
Additionally, the SEC Whistleblower program introduced the international reporting capabilities that have extended to other jurisdictions across the world. According to the SEC, they received 11 percent of total cases in 2011 from other jurisdictions. This number has increased over the years and the system has continued to introduce more features that are friendly to the whistleblowers.

September 14, 2016

Posted In: Attorneys